Voter fraud USA elections

The rise in both Republican and Democratic votes is ridiculously huge, look at the numbers (Eligible, Total, Republican, Democratic) for the past 20 years: 2020: E: 239.2m, T: 158.5; R: 74.2m, D: 81.3m 2016: E: 230.9m, T: 137.1; R: 63.0m, D: 65.9m 2012: E: 222.5m, T: 129.2; R: 60.9m, D: 65.9m 2008: E: 231.3m, T: 131.5; R: 60.0m, D: 69.3m 2004: E: 203.5m, T: 122.3; R: 62.0m, D: 59.0m 2000: E: 194.3m, T: 105.4; R: 50.5m, D: 51.0m As D Trump said in his speech, he would have been very pleased to increase his votes from 63m to 66m-67m, as that would have guaranteed him victory :-). For a double check, I had randomly a look at results of House races in Georgia for the past 6 elections, and the Democratic surge is also unprecedentedly huge: 2020: R: 2.49m, D: 2.39m 2018: R: 1.99m, D: 1.81m 2016: R: 2.27m, D: 1.50m 2012: R: 2.10m, D: 1.45m 2010: R: 1.53m, D: 0.94m 2008: R: 1.88m, D: 1.86m One of the more amusing extremes of the media is calling a small mob of sad characters an attempted coup or even "just" a protest with an insurrectionist character. From the same media I have seen no evidence of tanks or ground bombers attacking the capitol, or infantry or special forces brigades surrounding it. It is hard to believe that the president of the USA who is also a billionaire can only raise a small mob of sad characters to perform a coup on his behalf. The capitol is pretty much a fortress, Washington is heavily garrisoned, the security services monitor constantly all possible troubles: it is astonishing that a small mob of sad characters were allowed to get as far as they did. I wonder who is going to benefit from the inevitable turn of the screw on civil liberties, I doubt it will be the outgoing president. Stolen elections are not news in the USA, at least on a local level, but it rare that they matter to determine which party wins. Election fraud is quite common, but since most places are either solid Republican or solid Democratic, it is used to decides which of the bosses of the local party machine is on top. In the 2016 and 2020 elections there was a similar situation as to margins of victory: in both cases several states swung on a margin of around 1%. Well within noise. There is however a deeply suspicious element in the 2020 election: there was an enormous surge in the number of people who voted, and that is both surprising and unprecedented. Since both Republican and Democratic votes were much higher than in 2016, one possible conclusion is that both parties stuffed the ballot boxes (postal votes make it a lot easier and get abused in most countries adopting them), but perhaps one party did it better than the other. would have happened is the rioters had succeeded in stopping the certification of the election of the President by the Electoral College? * Their term having ended, Trump and Pence would be out of office. * The election of the President not being certified, Biden and Harris would not be in office. * The office of President would then pass to the Speaker of the House, Pelosi. Thus "logic" clearly suggests that the "coup" was setup by Pelosi to steal the presidency from Biden... :-) This is what a proper assault on a parliament, but at the time the Hong Kong Legislative Council was attacked by an organized group, nobody called it an "attempted coup" and a "violent insurrection": https://www.bbc.com/news/av/stories-49157807 “On 1 July 2019, hundreds of protesters stormed Hong Kong's Legislative Council, (Legco), spraying graffiti and defacing symbols of the Hong Kong law-making body. The ransacking of the government building marked a turning point in a protest movement against a now suspended extradition law.” attack and occupation of the Senate's Hart Building to block the confirmation of Kavanaugh in 2018: https://www.workers.org/2018/10/39345/ «At the vote confirming Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 6, woman after woman screamed out in protest from the Senate gallery and was carried away by guards. ... People were pounding in outrage on the closed entrance to the Senate floor. ... U.S. Capitol Police said a total of 164 people were arrested that day for “crowding, obstructing, or incommoding.” ... The depth of opposition to Kavanaugh was revealed when on Oct. 4 over a thousand people from throughout the country, mostly women, demonstrated on Capitol Hill. ... At the Senate Hart Office Building, crowds saying “NO” to sexual assault and to the reactionary agenda that Kavanaugh represents flooded the atrium and every floor. Over 300 chanting, militant protesters were arrested that day. ... There were too many acts of indignation and outrage at Kavanaugh’s nomination to list them all. ... Outrage against Kavanaugh broke out initially on July 9 at the Supreme Court on Capitol Hill ... During Senate Judiciary Committee hearings the first week in September, over 227 demonstrators were arrested. .... Hundreds were trained in a technique called “bird-dogging” — how to persistently follow and confront U.S. senators and representatives on crucial issues.»